Huffington Post and other content thiefs: why we must educate readers

February 3rd, 2012 § 0 comments § permalink

Chatting with my best friend last night about my misadventures with the Huffington Post made me realize how little the general public knows about the practices of the media companies they patronize, with their clicks if not their money.

My friend is a dentist and has no link to journalism other than her friendship to me and the little media consumption her busy medical career allows. She, like most of the general public if my friends are any indication, had no idea that the stories she may read on HuffPo or other sites are often stolen in whole or largely copied from other works, with no permission from or retribution to the original authors. And she, like most people with whom I shared my experience, was scandalized when she found out.

It’s not that they’re uncaring or thoughtless. It’s frankly that most have never asked themselves the question. What matters to most readers is what’s being said in the story, not how it got to their screen. Just like you don’t think about where dental prosthesis are manufactured… until you’re best friend with a dentist.

So with that in mind, after writing an angry message to the Huffington Post asking them to give credit to writers by name and pay them market freelance rates or remove the story (I haven’t got a response, no surprise there), I turned to the readers. I posted the following comment to the story that was largely plagiarized from my work. And, to HuffPo’s credit, it was approved and published.

No reaction from readers, and I don’t expect any as the story is a few days old now. But it felt good to say. The sad part though is that fighting this fight takes far too much time and energy, for freelancers whose time definitely is money. So most don’t do it, as I likely won’t for future stories. And thus they win…

How the Huffington Post stole my work

January 31st, 2012 § 3 comments § permalink

*Update (February 2nd, 2012): I just wrote an angry message to the Huffington Post, which, if nothing else, allowed me to vent. I don’t expect a response or a change of policy. Meanwhile, The Onion wrote the definitive venting piece for journalists whose work got stolen by HuffPo. With a very satisfying picture.*

Today, a friend alerted me to an article she saw on The Huffington Post that was very similar to the one I wrote for Good.is, about a French bank forgiving thousands of small loans. “Did they steal your work?” she asked. “Probably not, I said. The topic was much talked about, they must have done their own piece, like I did after hearing of it on the radio.”

But of course, they didn’t. The story the Huffington Post published is about two-thirds my work; the rest comes from an International Herald Tribune column by Chris Spence and a Europe 1 radio piece by Martin Feneau. Oh sure, we get a link to our stories and some credit (or the news orgs do, naught for the lowly writer). But credit doesn’t pay rent and being transparent about being a thief doesn’t make you any less of a thief.

I know the obvious counterargument: it’s link journalism. It’s a common practice of news sites and brings more traffic to the original site. Possible. I’d be curious to see the stats. But I see two kinds of link journalism: the “hey lookey over there, they’ve done great work” kind (two sentences and a link) and the “hey lookey over here, we’ve built an entire story out of other people’s reporting” kind. Guess which the Huffington Post committed.

Anyone who reads the HuffPost piece needs not click on the links to the original sources: everything’s been said in their story. The links are an excuse, a masquerade of respect for the original writers and publishers. What unnerves me most is that a multimillionaire would build a business model out of not paying for journalism while a small upstart website with a limited budget made an effort to pay me for original reporting. Or it may be that a successful organization stole the work of an unemployed journalist trying to establish herself professionally and support herself financially as a freelancer. It’s a tie really.

When an editor from an independent regional magazine read my piece, he enjoyed it and wrote to me, asking for me to pitch to him and write for pay. When an editor at the Huffington Post read my piece, they apparently enjoyed it… and said “let’s take it”. It pains me that the latter is becoming the law of the media land.

Our documentary “Total Brokenness” at Paris festival

October 25th, 2011 § 0 comments § permalink

I’m happy to report that the documentary film I helped produce in Cambodia will be shown at ECU 2012, the European Independent Film Festival in Paris (March 30-April 1, 2012).  It’s the film’s “outside of Cambodia” premiere.

“Total Brokenness” directed by Dong-won Kim and Mary Katherine Olsen is competing in the Non-European Documentary category for ÉCU 2012. This documentary focuses on the unsolved, brutal rape and murder of two young girls in Cambodia. On January 6, 2009, two bloody corpses were found hanging by a rope tied to a tree branch in a small Cambodian village of Pursat Province. The Cambodia Daily (Friday, January 9, 2009) reported Phal Sophoeun (14) and her cousin Nai Vinn (11) had been brutally raped, viciously beaten, and strangled to death. With few leads to the perpetrators, the bodies were buried soon after their discovery, leaving zero possibility for forensic evidence or further investigation by authorities.

 

“Total brokenness” explores the issue of sexual crimes against children in Cambodia and what happens to a traumatized society where there is no longer punishment for crime. It’s about  trauma, corruption, impunity and maybe, at the end of the road, redemption. The film was inspired by a series of stories I wrote at the Cambodia Daily in 2009, about the intolerable violence committed against children in the Cambodian countryside. Thanks to co-reporter Neou Vannarin and editor Kevin Doyle for their support; and many thanks to co-director/producer Mary Katherine Olsen for willing this film into being. See us both in Paris this March!

And a special thought for Nai Vinn and Phal Sophoeun…You are not forgotten.

 

Steve Jobs, 1955-2011

October 6th, 2011 § 0 comments § permalink

We are a generation of few heroes. Politics are rotten, Wall Street, well… and everywhere you turn to look, there’s a country going bankrupt, a friend losing their job. Grand theories ending in -ism never stuck with us. There are few, but there are a few, who can make us believe that the future is a better place. Our parents had John F. Kennedy and Neil Armstrong; we had Barack Obama for about 6 months in 2008 and, it’s not an hyperbole to say, we had Steve Jobs.

First impressions of Google +

July 11th, 2011 § 0 comments § permalink

One day in the spring of 2005, I had just been admitted to the University of Missouri and received my welcome package along with my .edu email address. “Great, said my friend Jon. Now you can get on Facebook!”

“On what?!”

Jump forward to last week and I was similarly introduced to Google+. Except this time, no one has to explain to me what social media is. I’ve been playing around with it, though frankly not posting much.

The number one problem is my friends aren’t on, and I don’t want to double post with Facebook. This could change quickly when you see what one week did for the size of its network (I’ve read estimates of several millions) compared to the time it took Facebook. A social network’s top asset is its database of people, much like a reporter’s is her rolodex. I have 400-something peeps on Facebook and 50-something on Google+, all of them from Mizzou or journalism circles. I’d be curious to see Google+’s international statistics: none of my French contacts are on, and I suspect it will take a while (though once we get on to a new technology, it usually spreads like wildfire. See facebook and cell phones, which took over the country in a matter of months.) At least, they were smart enough to localize the platform, it took Facebook years to go multi-language. Anyways, so far, it’s mostly, and logically, social media scholars and associated geeks who have adopted Google+. The discussions are very meta : social media people talking about social media on a social media platform. I tune out rather quickly (this blog post is a counterexample I guess).

Google+’s evident advantage is its Circles. You organize your contacts in social circles and decide what to share with each, much like you would in real life: family, work people, college friends, etc… It takes the guesswork out of controling your private life and is a major improvement on Facebook’s 50-click privacy controls. More importantly, I think it may mean that the type of communication on Google+ can be widely different from Facebook’s.

Facebook’s lack of privacy controls implies two caveats : 1) because everyone can see, we limit what we share and what we say (or at least we should) and 2) because everyone can see, we stage what we say. Often, Facebook isn’t about communication, it’s about exposition. We create profiles that are pretty much us, except only the good public image we’d like to have. We don’t say things because our mother or that great newsroom recruiter are in our “friends” and we do say other things because that great new crush is in there too. By allowing us to select who gets to hear what, Google+ has the potential to foster more sincere communication, to be less about online reputation and more about genuine connection. Then again, it also reduces the happenstance that is the beauty of Facebook, the friends of friends commenting on your stuff and launching you into great conversations. I’m curious to see how it plays out in my own social media diet.

What’s certain is I, like many, am experiencing social media fatigue. I’ve signed up for everything that’s out there, per professional curiosity, but never could really get into them. Twelve times I tried to regularly use Twitter and never stuck with it. Only Facebook stuck. And if Google+ does stick, the book will most likely have to go. To be continued…

PS: friends wanting google+ invites, contact me.

Be kind and rewind

July 10th, 2011 § 0 comments § permalink

I lost a couple years of blogging in a site migration gone awry. Lucky they weren’t the busiest years. I guess I should start writing again now… Brb.

Temple de Preah Vihear

November 3rd, 2008 § 0 comments § permalink

Me voilà revenue d’une semaine de reportage dans divers coins de la campagne cambodgienne. Je raconterai tout, mais je n’ai pas l’énergie. Je commence simplement par quelques photos du temple de Preah Vihear, que j’ai enfin vu après plusieurs semaines à le couvrir à distance.

 

Le portail dentrée du complexe, sans doute limage la plus célèbre du temple que l'on voit partout en ligne.

Le portail d'entrée du complexe, sans doute l'image la plus célèbre du temple.

 

 

Le temple se compose de 4 temples, avec entre chaque un chemin et trop de marches pour une asthmatique.

Le temple se compose de 4 sections, appelées gopura, avec entre chaque un chemin et trop de marches pour une asthmatique. Sur cette photo, le troisième gopura.

L’internet fait grève. Je m’arrête à deux photos et vous promet la suite bientôt.

Have questions for the Thai and Cambodian Foreign Affairs ministers?

October 11th, 2008 § 0 comments § permalink

The Thai Foreign Affairs minister, Sompong Amornvivat, arrives in Phnom Penh on Monday morning and will hold a news conference with his Cambodian couterpart, Hor Namhong, about the border dispute and military standoff. I will be there. I see the blogosphere is teeming with debates about the situation. What questions would you like to ask of the ministers? Post them in comments by Monday 9 am and I’ll do my best to ask them/include them in my reporting.

A day with Vann Molyvann

September 22nd, 2008 § 2 comments § permalink

Vann Molyvann (Pardon the poor photo, I was too busy taking notes.)

Vann Molyvann (Pardon the poor photo, I was too busy taking notes.)

There are days — many if you’re lucky — when being a journalist is more than a job, more than the only thing you can picture yourself doing: it’s a privilege. Sunday was a day like that.

I spent a good chunk of the day discovering parts of Phnom Penh I had not yet seen — and another, the Foreign Language Institute, where I was just the day before without fully appreciating it — with Vann Molyvann, the leader of an architecture movement in the 1950s and 1960s that truly built modern Cambodia under the direction of now-retired King Norodom Sihanouk.

As far as tour guides go, he’s definitely as good as it gets. I always find fascinating to meet people who have seen moments in history I have only read about in textbooks. Maybe one day, I’ll be an old woman who can say she’s seen 9/11, Bill Clinton and Vann Molyvann. In the meantime, I just feel privileged talking to them and brushing past history.

For the full story, pick up today’s Cambodia Daily.

This is why I haven’t been posting

September 11th, 2008 § 0 comments § permalink

A fisherman's boat at Koh Tonsay, an island in the Gulf of Thailand where I was 2 weeks ago. (Photo copyright me)

A fisherman's boat at Koh Tonsay, an island on the Gulf of Thailand across from Kep, Cambodia, where I was two weeks ago. (© me)

Among other things: a bit of blogging fatigue frankly, we all go through it. And not much Internet connection. But a lot of exciting developments are happening, which I will write about soon.

Phnom Penh readers, look for me at BarCamp Phnom Penh, Sept 20 at the Cambodia-Japan Cooperation Center.

  • Paris-based writer and editor with a love for foreign affairs and narrative journalism, gone through the US and Cambodia before returning home to France. Proud Missouri School of Journalism '08 grad. Currently working as a freelancer covering French news for anglophone media while also, frankly, looking for a full-time staff gig. Hire me!
  • I tweet @thejjunkie

  •  

    February 2012
    M T W T F S S
    « Jan    
     12345
    6789101112
    13141516171819
    20212223242526
    272829